The purpose of this amendment is to revise the Evlauation Criteria for award by removing Contractor Location. EVALUATION CRITERIA (Revised 5/15/2015): Award will be made to the schedule contractor that represents the "best value" as defined as "the expected outcome of an acquisition that, in the Government's estimation, provides the greatest overall benefit in response to the requirement" using the following evaluation criteria: a. Contractor Understanding of the Requirement: Contractor must provide project plan/overview of the Government requirement to determine and evaluate the contractor understanding of the Government requirements contained in this Statement of Work (SOW) and solicitation amendments posted through/prior to the solicitation close date. b. Safety Plan: Contractor to provide overview of project safety plan proposed for meeting the Government/SOW requirements. c. Company Overview/Experience: Company overview and references of a least three of the same or similar projects. References must contain brief overview of the project and customer contact Information. d. Past Performance: Will be evaluated as Acceptable or Unacceptable based on past performance information obtained from any other sources available to the Government, to include, but not limited to, the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS). In the case of a scheduled contractor without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available, the scheduled contractor will not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance. e. Price: No additional information from the contractor will be required if the price is based on adequate price competition. In the event adequate price competition does not exist, the contracting officer will obtain information from the scheduled contractor to the extent required to determine the reasonableness of the offered prices.

Bid Protests Not Available